Homophobic bullying is a social phenomenon very alarming based on sex differences and gender stigma.
While AMO is postive nearly all of them are. Originally posted by snowmi: It is interesting that although models are in agreement that it must get warmer from extra CO2, just a question of how much, they show no agreement on rainfall from extra CO2.
Rainfall projections for Australia from AGW I think that rainfall will get more intense and sporadic in nature everywhere but overall slightly less rain inland and slightly more on the coast. So it may seem like overall there is still the same rainfall for Australia but the usefulness of the rain will be reduced because it is not falling evenly and often and higher temps will make it dry out faster.
Keep in mind that same rainfall and higher temperatures is going to mean drier conditions due to increased evaporatinos. In areas such as Brisbane where there is a good chance of no significant reduction in rainfall the trend towards heavier rain less often will be good for large dams such as Brisbane's urban water supply which rely on relatively rare heavy rain events.
The thickness and length of the lower extent of glaciers in the European Alps have both reduced by considerable amounts since the 60s even though in good years low summer melt or high winter snowfall they record an advance.
The net effect is consistent retreat in all the major glaciers, which being major, descend deeper into the valleys or down slope.
The New Guinea glaciers were a good example of this. They were truly temperate but once torrential snowfall was replaced by torrential rain they rapidly vanished. I think the only way to convince you of the difference would to actually visit the Alestch or Mer de Glace glaciers where the downwasting at the edges, the lateral moraines, and the retreat of the terminal ice face especially in the case of the former is very obvious.
The thinning of the Chamonix facing glaciers of Mt Blanc is so severe that we see transient crevasses that expose the bedrock, so that you observe disconnected sections of the likes of the Bossons Glacier sliding down slope separate from each other rather than as a continuous tongue.
The depth of the ice is no longer thicker than the depth at which crevasses self seal. This has effectively cut off the original ascent route. On the Italian side the Innominata Route, which was somewhat extreme at the best of times, is now very hazardous because of the collapse of a hanging section of glacier.
However once you get above 13, feet or so there are no obvious signs of glacial retreat on the north or Chamonix side of the massif. It is as densely covered by ice as ever, which is what you also find above feet in the Mt Cook area. Originally posted by Mike Hauber: What is telling from that chart is during an AMO cool phase, which is going to effect Europe stronger than most places on the planet, half of the glaciers are still retreating and half advancing.
I notice both sides feels passionate about this matter. My cousin in Taipei said of the matter - can we prove beyond doubt that we humans are not having any effect on the climate. I am more inclined to just sit on the fence here and observe the infomration and how people react.
I think we are pretty sure this is inevitable. We all know that when the temperature soars nowadays the grid is hit super hard by the aircon use. So there is your biggest consumer of fossil fuel. I think we have got soft and are spinning out if it gets over mid high twenties.
I have not suggested that because the glaciers were retreating by means anything more than that they were melting faster than they they could renew their ice mass. Gore, or polar bears, or even drop bears don't seem particularly relevant to the discussion.
The last AGW thread should be reopened or continued by starting a sequel to it. For as long as the weatherzone forums remain open, GW is always going to creep on here one way or another.
It would be far easier to moderate it if there was one general AGW thread so everyone can have their say about any topic relating to AGW provided it is not personal attacks, etc. It is now going to get very messy if everyone starts opening a new thread based on one topic relating to AGW.
In the meantime, keep on topic, debate it, but NO personal attacks will be tolerated. Predicts Foot Sea Level Rise in 10 years Plus Gore's prediction of million refugees per metre of sea level rise.
With a 67 metre rise that is 6.Received: from torosgazete.com by torosgazete.com id aa; 1 Jun 90 EDT Received: from torosgazete.com by torosgazete.com id aa; 1. FARZANA PANHWAR. INDUSTRY. THE SINDH RURAL WOMEN’S UP-LIFT GROUP.
E-MAIL. Its aim to create equality, equal opportunity, eliminate torosgazete.comications and methods to achieve. Internet is a best opportunity for such purposes.
There may be indirect effects due to change in pH of the medium. discrimination. Describe how direct or indirect discrimination may occur in the work setting.
Explain how practices that support diversity, equality and inclusion reduce the likelihood of discrimination. Meaning of diversity may include: different varied respecting individuals’ differences celebrating individuals’ differences.
Describe ways in which discrimination may deliberately or inadvertently occur in the work settings. Jan 19, · Direct discrimination would be abusing someone for their race, using the N word for example. Indirect discrimination would be not so obvious but still discriminatory, doing something like asking somebody in a Status: Open.
• Discrimination: is an unfair or unequal treatment of an individual or group on the grounds of age, ability, gender, race etc. its being disadvantaged or excluded in the same situation. Describe how direct or indirect discrimination may occur in the work setting.5/5(1).